Is California bigger than Montana

Is California Bigger than Montana?

When comparing the size of different states, it’s essential to consider factors like population, area, and population density. In this blog post, we’ll explore the question: Is California bigger than Montana?

Is California Bigger than Montana?

In terms of area covered, California is bigger than Montana. California covers an area of 163,696 square miles, while Montana has a land area of 147,040 square miles. That makes California 1.1 times the size of Montana.

Yes, California is bigger than Montana in terms of both population and area. Let’s break it down:

  • Area: California covers an expansive area of approximately 163,696 square miles, while Montana encompasses around 147,040 square miles. Consequently, California is approximately 1.1 times larger than Montana in terms of area.
  • Population: California has a population of approximately 39,185,605 people, whereas Montana has a population of around 1,122,867 individuals. Therefore, California’s population is approximately 35 times larger than Montana’s.

Population: California vs Montana

California population vs Montana
Population: California vs Montana

California is undoubtedly more populous than Montana. With a population of nearly 39.2 million people, California is the most populous state in the United States. On the other hand, Montana, with a population of around 1.1 million people, ranks among the least densely populated states.

Population Density: California vs Montana

California vs Montana population density comparison

Population density is an important measure of how crowded or sparse an area is. California’s population density stands at approximately 251.3 individuals per square mile, reflecting its high population concentration. Conversely, Montana’s population density is significantly lower, with just 7.09 individuals per square mile. This substantial disparity indicates that California is much more densely populated than Montana.

Area: California vs Montana

California size vs Montana
Size comparison: California vs Montana

While California is larger than Montana in terms of both population and area, the difference in their sizes is less pronounced when considering land area. California’s area spans around 163,696 square miles, making it the third-largest state in the United States.

Montana, with an area of approximately 147,040 square miles, is the fourth-largest state. Although California has a larger land area, the disparity is not as significant as in population.

Table Comparing Area, Population, and Density: California vs Montana

To provide a comprehensive overview, let’s compare the area, population, and population density of California and Montana in the following table:

StateArea (sq mi)PopulationPopulation Density (per sq mi)
California size vs Montana

This table highlights the substantial differences between the two states, emphasizing California’s larger population and higher population density.


California and Montana possess diverse geographical features that contribute to their unique appeal. California is renowned for its stunning coastline along the Pacific Ocean, breathtaking mountains such as the Sierra Nevada and the Cascade Range, and iconic landmarks like Yosemite National Park and Death Valley.

Montana, on the other hand, boasts picturesque landscapes with the majestic Rocky Mountains, picturesque lakes, and vast expanses of plains. Both states offer diverse and captivating natural beauty.


Given their size and population, it is not surprising that both California and Montana have multiple airports catering to domestic and international travel. California is home to several major airports, including Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), San Francisco International Airport (SFO), and San Diego International Airport (SAN), among others.

Montana has several regional airports, with the busiest being Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport (BZN) and Billings Logan International Airport (BIL). These airports provide convenient travel options for residents and visitors alike.


California possesses the world’s fifth-largest economy,with diverse industries such as technology, entertainment, agriculture, and tourism contributing significantly to its economic prowess. The state is home to major companies like Apple, Google, and Disney.

Montana, although smaller in population and area, has a robust economy driven by sectors such as agriculture, mining, tourism, and manufacturing. The state is known for its rich mineral resources, including coal, oil, and gas. Both states offer unique opportunities for economic growth and development.

Quality of Life

Both California and Montana offer distinct lifestyles and quality of life factors. California’s vibrant cities, cultural diversity, and access to entertainment and technology contribute to its dynamic atmosphere. The state boasts a mild climate in many regions, providing outdoor recreational opportunities year-round.

Montana, on the other hand, offers a more laid-back and nature-centric lifestyle. The state’s pristine wilderness, abundant wildlife, and wide-open spaces appeal to those seeking tranquility and outdoor adventures. Quality of life preferences may vary depending on individual preferences and priorities.

In conclusion, California is indeed bigger than Montana in terms of population, population density, and area. California’s population is significantly larger, its population density is higher, and its land area is slightly greater.

However, both states possess their own unique attributes, geography, and opportunities, making them special in their own right. Whether you’re drawn to the vibrant energy of California or the serene landscapes of Montana, each state has something unique to offer residents and visitors alike.

Here are other posts comparing the size of California with other states and countries:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *